News

Search

Exxonmobil, Shell and Caltex decreased its Petrol Price.

Monday, October 26th, 2009 Posted in News

As of Monday, 26 October 2009, 4.00pm, we can confirm that Exxonmobil, Shell and Caltex decreased its Petrol Price.

  • Exxonmobil - 2.45pm at 24th October 2009
  • Shell - 10.00am at 26th October 2009
  • Caltex - 1.00pm at 26th October 2009

Significant changes in prices are reflected in detail and can be viewed in the tables below.

SHELL
Type
Old price
New price
Formula 95 (95UL)
S$ 1.767
No Change
Formula 98 (98UL)
S$ 1.900
S$ 1.860
V-Power
S$ 2.019
No Change
Shell Diesel (AGO)
S$ 1.243
No Change
EXXONMOBIL
Type
Old price
New price
Synergy 2000
S$ 1.717
No Change
Synergy 5000
S$ 1.767
No Change
Synergy 8000
S$ 1.900
S$ 1.860
Synergy Diesel
S$ 1.243
No Change
SPC
Type
Old price
New price
ULG 92
S$ 1.717 No Change
ULG 95
S$ 1.767
No Change
ULG 98
S$ 1.860
No Change
Diesel
S$ 1.243
No Change
CALTEX
Type
Old price
New price
Regular 92 with Techron
S$ 1.717
No Change
Premium 95 with Techron
S$ 1.767
No Change
Platinum 98 with Techron
S$ 1.900
S$ 1.860
Power Diesel
S$ 1.243
No Change

Summary of price changes:

  • Grade 98: Decreased by 4 cents (Exxonmobil & Shell)
  • Premium: Decreased by 4 cents (Caltex)


18 Responses to “Exxonmobil, Shell and Caltex decreased its Petrol Price.”

  1. aus_share Says:

    Only RON98? What abt RON 92, 95?

  2. Annoymous Says:

    aint gonna fall, they are just trying to match SPC who refused to waiver to the BIG 3.. good work SPC!

  3. sigh... Says:

    I doubt this will stay for long as oil prices still above US$80 per barrel.

  4. kenlew73 Says:

    I really admire SPC this time round as they refuse to bulge so SPC have force the big boy to follow their ron 98 pricing. the big boys is also having no backbone. SPC should always lead the price to go lower. Good work SPC !

  5. hesperus Says:

    I dun like SPC’s fuel cos the fuel efficiency very poor. I thought there wouldn’t be any difference between the brands but I was wrong.. For Altis, from full tank to 3/4 I can travel 150+km.. but with SPC only 110km+..

  6. petrol fall petrol fall Says:

    just noted something

    everytime esso n caltex up price b4 shell the crude oil price will fall the following week.
    now crude oil at 78.7

  7. aus_share Says:

    Hi hesperus,

    i agree with u. SPC fuel efficiency is bad. The quality of the fuel is poor.

    In fact, i notice each time i pump SPC, my engine will be noiser. However, if i were to pump ESSO & Shell,
    my engine run is smoother.

    For SPC with 33 litres of pump, i am able to travel only 420km.

    If i were to pump ESSO & Shell, i am able to travel 470+km.

    hesperus Says:

    October 26th, 2009 at 11:03 pm
    I dun like SPC’s fuel cos the fuel efficiency very poor. I thought there wouldn’t be any difference between the brands but I was wrong.. For Altis, from full tank to 3/4 I can travel 150+km.. but with SPC only 110km+..

  8. RON Says:

    Is it true that Ron 92 fuel has lower fuel efficiency than Ron 95?

    End of the day, should we monitor Price per Km, rather than Price per Litre?

  9. foundation Says:

    # RON Says:
    October 27th, 2009 at 11:09 am

    Is it true that Ron 92 fuel has lower fuel efficiency than Ron 95?

    End of the day, should we monitor Price per Km, rather than Price per Litre?
    ———————————————————————————————————–
    In the past that may have been so, but I have read that nowadays, the ECU is “clever” enough to optimise the engine performance such that there will be little or no difference in terms of efficiency for the 2 oils.

    In essence, nowadays we should read Ron 92 and Ron 95 as different specifications, not necessary grade of the fuel. This of course goes against what the big petrol companies want us to believe (because if we pump 95 when what our car really needs is only 92, they make the difference :) ). Personally I have tried 95 and 98 fuel with absolutely no difference in efficiency at all, haha..

  10. NoSPC Says:

    Tried SPC many times due to their promotion but felt that their fuel is not fuel efficient compared to other companies. Maybe that why they are “cheaper” (ie more discounts) compared to the rest. For me personally, i feel the best quality is Shell. (maybe thats why they offer the least discount among all). I guess what you pay is what you get.

  11. sigh... Says:

    SPC is now owned by China company. Wondered would there by any changes in strategy?

  12. aaa Says:

    knn.. decrease 98 only… for a moment i was puzzled how come so good petrol company will reduce price now… until i saw its only for 98,,, its wishful thinking !!

  13. xxxjl Says:

    Hahaha…. just a delay tactics to tell ppl that petrol is reducing price but in an general form….

  14. (__|__)Hole Says:

    I pumped V-power from JB after a trip back from Malacca, i have to admit it makes my gear shift transmission better compare with the other grades of petrol.

    I guess its really true about paying more for quality.

  15. aaa Says:

    crude price has dropped.. when are the bloodsucking petrol companies gg to give back my price reduction!!

  16. sigh... Says:

    the drop is too little for them to take action. need to hit at least $70 before they will reduce.

  17. yehoo Says:

    Avoid caltex at all time bcoz they always the 1st to increase the price. Support SPC for not increasing the price unrealistically. Plus SPC have at least 10% discount not includeding $2 off ever $40 top up. GO SPC!!

  18. vpower Says:

    Today till Sun 7 to 11pm got Vpower promo…..going to pump Vpower later tonight.

Leave a Reply